Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Gordon Smith: At last, a step in the right direction… 10 years late

Gordon Smith (Andrew Cawley / DC Thomson)
Gordon Smith (Andrew Cawley / DC Thomson)

THEY say a journey of 10,000 miles begins with a single step.

On Thursday night we saw Scottish football finally embark on a process I advocated 10 years ago.

The SFA summit meeting between the Premier League managers and the country’s top referees ended with unanimous support for the introduction of video assistant referee technology, better known as VAR.

This, all sides agreed, would help support the officials, who have been the source of huge criticism this season.

It would also, through the lowering of their blood pressure if nothing else, help the managers who have been getting themselves so worked up.

Why? Because we would get the correct decisions, which surely has to be a good thing.

That was the point I argued to the international game’s ruling bodies a decade ago.

It was rejected on the grounds it would diminish the essential “human element” of the sport.

While that hurdle has now been crossed, there remains a long way to go, many questions to be answered, and details to be thrashed out.

For starters, I was intrigued why only 10 of the league’s managers made it to the meeting.

Kilmarnock’s Steve Clarke – a very vocal critic of referees on occasion this season – and Hamilton Accies boss Martin Canning were both absent.

This, I would have thought, was as important a date on the football calendar as there will be all year.

In their absence, it was no great surprise to see Neil Lennon – not adverse to criticising referees but an intelligent, articulate guy – emerge as the spokesman for the bosses.

It was nice to hear him state how impressed he was with Clare Whyte, the SFA’s new compliance officer.

Where I did disagree with the comments made after the meeting was the talk about the desirability of having full-time referees.

Provided the officials can reach the required fitness levels – which is, of course, essential – I don’t see any problem with them remaining part-time.

Indeed, I can see benefits because switching to a day job allows them to get away from the strains of taking charge of our national game on a Saturday afternoon.

In short, to keep things in perspective, a commodity which can be in short supply in Scottish football.

There is also a financial angle to this. Most of our refs tend to come from good professions and are already well-paid.

Add in the money they get from officiating, and they are able to earn a good living.

I am not convinced this would be the case if football was their only means of income.

How would it work, for example, when they were required to drop down the divisions – a step that usually involves a substantial drop in fee?

No, I think it makes more sense to focus on the technology itself and get in VAR as soon as possible.

I am at a loss as to why it will apparently take 12 months for the relevant training and testing to take place.

This makes no sense at all to me.

As far as I’m aware, this is not especially complicated equipment we are talking about.

Basically it is no different from what we all have in our front rooms.

Craig Levein has said he would rather VAR was embraced as soon as possible, and I would echo those sentiments wholeheartedly.

Judging by the comments of Ian Maxwell, the SFA’s chief executive, it is likely to be only the top clubs who feel the benefit the technology.

He has implied they are the ones who will have to foot the bill, possibly with the contributions coming straight off the money they receive from the SPFL.

That’s not to suggest the SFA aren’t interested in the thoughts of the lower-league clubs. They will meet with the coaches from the Championship, League One and League Two in due course.

In these case, though, VAR is unlikely to be the main topic of conversation.

That’s a shame as we would like all clubs to benefit from the technology.

The key point, though, is the move in the right direction.