Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner.

Scottish fire chiefs to consider using budget vans without full rescue equipment

A truck similar to those being considered
A truck similar to those being considered

CUT-PRICE fire trucks carrying only a fraction of the equipment of a traditional appliance could be introduced across Scotland.

A senior officer has been tasked with examining the feasibility of introducing “tactical response vehicles” to the Scottish fire service.

The specially adapted vehicles – often 4×4 cars or vans – can be sent out on 999 calls, but lack the full capacities of traditional fire engines and are manned by fewer staff.

And they have proven controversial in England, where they have replaced some larger appliances.

They cost around £60,000 each to buy and equip – while a regular fire engine costs about £250,000.

Deputy Assistant Fire Officer John Miller will look at bringing them into use across Scotland – raising fears of job losses.

One fire source described the move – which came as deaths and casualities from fires last year rose by 14% to 1301 cases – as simply about “cutting costs”.

Chris McGlone, of the Fire Brigades Union Scotland, said: “We have not had discussions with the service, other than very informally.

“The principle behind them is that you can run them with two or three firefighters.

“Whether or not we think that’s a safe and responsible model is completely different.

“The evidence has not convinced us at the moment that this is where we want the direction of the fire service to go.

“Clearly, that’s the direction of travel in the UK fire service. It doesn’t surprise us that they are considering them. You can look at it as a consequence of cuts, or you can look at it as a solution.

“Either way, it results in fewer bodies, fewer jobs and a smaller fire service, and it reduces the operational capacity of the service.’

Mr McGlone said union leaders would soon be “sitting down with the service and looking at options for the next few years”.

He added: “At the moment we are pretty lucky, compared with the rest of the UK.

“But I think we would be naïve to think we are going to be protected from budget cuts.”

The vehicles have been in use in England for the last couple of years, where they have replaced some fire engines.

But their introduction has been fiercely opposed by union leaders who insist they put “the public and firefighters at risk”. Earlier this year, two North Yorkshire firefighters were sent home without pay after refusing to operate them.

The vehicles can deal with small incidents such as bin fires, while also supporting standard fire engines at more serious events such as house fires.

But union bosses have raised fears about their “limited firefighting capabilities” and unsuitability for rescue operations if they are first on the scene.

Their introduction has also come hand-in-hand with job losses and wider cuts.

The Scottish Fire and Rescue Service currently operates a safe crewing policy that means engines are staffed with four or five firefighters – but tactical response vehicles are usually operated by just two or three officers.

Scottish Labour Justice spokesperson Claire Baker MSP said: “Concerns from the Fire Brigade Union must be taken seriously and be fully addressed before any final decision is taken by the service.’

A fire service spokesman said: “As the fourth largest fire service in the world, we actively review a range of technological developments to explore what can be harnessed to best protect the very diverse communities of Scotland.”