Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Cop26 first draft presidency agreement faces criticism with fossil fuels only mentioned once

© Andrew CawleyCop26 demonstrators in George Square, Glasgow, protesting lack of action on climate change by world leaders.
Cop26 demonstrators in George Square, Glasgow, protesting lack of action on climate change by world leaders.

A draft “cover decision” setting out the potential outcome from the Cop26 climate summit has been published by the UK presidency of the talks.

The document urges countries to “revisit and strengthen” their emissions cutting targets for 2030 in their national action plans by the end of 2022 to meet the goal to try to limit global warming to 1.5C.

The decision, which will have to be negotiated and agreed by countries attending the talks, also urges them to set out plans and policies to hit net zero emissions by or around mid-century, by the end of next year.

Poorest can no longer be ignored, says Ugandan climate activist Vanessa Nakate

It calls for countries to accelerate the phasing-out of coal and subsidies for fossil fuels, and for developed countries to at least double their collective provision of climate finance to help developing countries adapt to climate change, as part of scaling money for poorer nations to tackle the crisis.

The document has faced heavy criticism however, with analysts saying there is a big gap between long-term targets and shorter-term action.

The call for all parties to accelerate the phasing out of coal and subsidies for fossil fuels is the only reference to fossil fuels in the seven-page document.

However, even that is more than some activists were fearing and expecting.

There were concerns that it would not be mentioned at all due to lobbying by countries with large fossil fuel industries.

On Wednesday, Greenpeace International’s executive director Jennifer Morgan was one of the first to react to the draft. She said:  “This draft deal is not a plan to solve the climate crisis, it’s an agreement that we’ll all cross our fingers and hope for the best.

“It’s a polite request that countries maybe, possibly, do more next year. Well, that’s not good enough and the negotiators shouldn’t even think about leaving this city until they’ve agreed a deal that meets the moment. Because most assuredly, this one does not.

Power grab: The story of Ineos, its founder and the rise and rise of oil industry’s new generation

“We’ve just had a landmark study showing we’re heading for 2.4C of warming. The job of this conference was always to get that number down to 1.5C, but with this text world leaders are punting it to next year. If this is the best they can come up with then it’s no wonder kids today are furious at them.

“The text needs to be much stronger on finance and adaptation and needs to include real numbers in the hundreds of billions, with a delivery plan for richer countries to support less developed nations.

“And we need to see a deal that commits countries to coming back every year with new and better plans until together they get us over the bar and we can stay below 1.5C of warming.

“And while the text calls for an accelerated phaseout of coal and fossil fuel subsidies, wreckers like the Saudi and Australian governments will be working to gut that part before this conference closes.

“Ministers now have three days to turn this around and get the job done here in Glasgow instead of once again kicking the climate can down the road.”

They had called on negotiators to stand up to fossil fuel-producing countries, and insist on “no cheating, no loopholes, no offset scams, and no greenwash”.

Ed Miliband, the shadow business secretary, also weighed in on this morning’s draft Cop26 text: “The last 24 hours have been a devastating reality check on what has actually been delivered at this summit,” he said.

“We are miles from where we need to be to halve global emissions this decade. Today, Boris Johnson needs to stop the spin and confront the reality.

“Given this summit will not deliver anything like what we needed, now he has to turn to plotting a path out of Glasgow that can keep 1.5C alive.”


Former Prime Minister Gordon Brown says Boris Johnson needs to do more to ensure COP26 is a success.

Speaking on BBC Radio 4’s Today programme, he said there was a “great deal of ambitious talk” in the draft deal but the “problem is that the the two make or break decisions of this conference are not being made”.

He said further meetings next year were being proposed before nations would commit to cutting emissions by 2030 or formally back the call to rein in temperature rises of above 1.5C.

He described the document as “an admission of prospective failure”.