Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Champions League? Stats show non-title winners have a better chance of success in the tournament

Juventus FC head coach Massimiliano Allegri and Zinedine Zidane, Head Coach of Real Madrid.(Emilio Andreoli & Aitor Alcalde/Getty Images)
Juventus FC head coach Massimiliano Allegri and Zinedine Zidane, Head Coach of Real Madrid.(Emilio Andreoli & Aitor Alcalde/Getty Images)

TEAMS entering the Champions League are better-of not winning their domestic title if they want success, new research reveals.

The stats show that clubs are more likely to progress to the latter stages of the tournament if they qualified from a lower league position.

Real Madrid, La Liga runners-up, therefore have a better chance of winning Saturday’s final than Italian champions Juventus, according to boffins at Bonus Code Bets.

They crunched the numbers across all finals and semi-finals since the restructuring of the Champions League and found that, on average, a semi-finalist will have finished second in their domestic league in the previous season.

Just 46% of the final four teams were victorious in their previous national campaign.

The data, which looks at the last 25 years of the competition, also shows that no domestic champion has won the competition since Barcelona in 2011.

Only 8% of winners have come from a team that finished fourth in their league during the previous campaign, and a quarter of semi-final spots are taken-up by teams who finished third or below.

The findings would appear to give Real the edge over their Italian opponents – plus they’ve never lost a Champions League final.

Juventus, meanwhile, have a disappointing win-rate of just 20%, losing their fourth of five finals in 2015.

However, fans can take solace from the fact that the success rate of those who get to the final is marginally better for league champions.

The Italian champions will be hoping to follow the 54% of teams that were victorious in the final, after their domestic success the year before.

If you’re looking to put money on the match or impress friends with an accurate prediction, the data suggests the outcome of the game is likely to be tight and past score lines agree with this.

The most common score in European Cup finals is 1-0, which has been the result on 14 occasions, although since the tournament was rebranded 25 years ago, penalty shootouts have been a common deciding factor – seven finals have been decided on spot kicks.

Teams from the two nations have met in the final on three occasions with AC Milan the only Italian side to topple a Spanish opponent (beating Barcelona 4-0 in 1994).

In fact, Juve have lost finals to both Real and Barcelona, falling short in 1998 and 2015 respectively.

Alexander Kostin of Bonus Code Bets said: “The final seems finely poised and our research suggests the same. What is very surprising is to see how unimportant it is to actually be a champion to win the so-called ‘Champions League’.

“Real’s record in finals should give them the edge but don’t write the Old Lady off! Juve will be out to avenge their loss from the 1997/98 campaign.”