Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Moi Ali: Allowing accused officers to retire is unfair on them, their accusers and us

Police Scotland passing out parade (Kris Miller/DC Thomson)
Police Scotland passing out parade (Kris Miller/DC Thomson)

IF my daughter accused my son of stealing her sweets when they were bairns and I chastised him, he’d rightly wail that it wasn’t fair.

What about his side of the story? Small kids can’t articulate the right to a fair hearing is a central tenet of natural justice, but they know what’s fair – and what isn’t.

Those making accusations, and those defending themselves, need to have their say.

The evidence of both sides can then be assessed impartially and a judgement reached. Did he scoff her sweets? Or was she lying?

It’s such a simple concept, even children “get it”. In playgrounds across Scotland you’ll hear children complaining: “Miss, it’s no fair,” when they encounter an injustice.

So when Phil Gormley resigned as Chief Constable of Police Scotland earlier this month, with five separate complaints investigations ongoing, any chance of a fair hearing – for him, so he could clear his name, or for his accusers so they could substantiate their concerns – ended.

Bully, or innocent victim of malicious complaints?

Chiefs accused of spying probe whitewash after two bosses retire

We’ll never know, because the regulations governing complaints about police in Scotland mean that if an officer retires or resigns, the process halts.

It’s unfair on Gormley, who will forever have a cloud hanging over him.

Equally, it’s unfair on his accusers, who complained in order to have their concerns investigated.

There are no winners. Even Police Scotland lose, because any opportunity for organisational learning from this whole sorry saga is lost.

I’ve spent two decades working in various complaints and professional conduct roles.

The Scottish regulations make no sense, as the only people they protect are the guilty, who can resign simply to escape an investigation and evade justice.

I’m not suggesting this was the case with Phil Gormley, but others have sometimes acted in this way.

Not one but two Police Scotland leaders probed before they quit

That’s why I intend to petition the Scottish Parliament to change the regulations so investigations can continue even if someone leaves the service. There’s already something similar in England and Wales.

It boosts the standing of the police in the eyes of the public, because citizens know police officers accused of gross misconduct will be investigated – even if they resign or retire.

I have great respect for the hard-working officers in Police Scotland and I’d like to see the reputation of policing protected by regulations that ensure the tiny minority of bad apples are brought to justice.