Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner.

The Sunday Post view: A judgment, a doubling-down, and good debate starts going bad

Post Thumbnail

If Godwin’s Law – named after the US attorney who invented it – suggests the longer any internet discussion continues, the more likely it is that someone will make a Nazi analogy, then MacGodwin’s Law would mean any row about Scottish nationalism will inevitably lead to one side accusing the other of Trumpism.

Last week, both sides pointed the finger almost simultaneously after the first minister told supporters this is no longer about independence but democracy.

Happed up outside Holyrood as winter bit, Nicola Sturgeon told a Yes rally the Supreme Court’s flat refusal to countenance her government unilaterally legislating for another independence referendum had raised the stakes.

If voters choose a majority of MSPs who explicitly support a referendum then it is called a mandate, she thundered, and, for anyone – well, Westminster – to foil that mandate is an affront to the very principles of democracy.

She was – and is – absolutely right. Of course, the SNP-Green coalition has a mandate for a referendum and the UK Government should stop dancing on the head of a pin trying to deny it.

Meanwhile, unionists are also right when they splutter the first minister has a brass neck to talk about democracy when her promise to respect the 2014 result lasted about as long as a roll and sausage.

That hardening conviction on both sides, and the claims that both are the only true defenders of democracy, is just one reason why our interminable constitutional debate ploughed into the dark last week, with the clutching of pearls and talk of dangerous populism and Donald Trump.

It is too much, too melodramatic, and too polarising in a country already split right down the middle. Frankly, Scotland does not need any more flags and facepaint claptrap from the SNP or faux outrage and whataboutery from their opponents.

We need what we have needed every day since 2014: calm, serious voices suggesting compromise and shades of grey instead of dogma and bludgeoning black and white.

For example, Nicola Sturgeon’s strident insistence that refusing to allow a referendum next year is an affront to the democratic rights of every Scot would carry more weight if more than 30% of us actually wanted a vote next year.

In normal times, her mandate for a referendum should have been honoured – and allowed to be honoured – but, whatever normal times look like, it’s not now, just after a global pandemic and just before an economic catastrophe.

Scotland has not turned a wheel in eight years with everything that matters, from transport and the NHS to the economy and education stuck in the mud as politicians bark about constitutional hypotheticals.

No amount of constitutional reform or devolution of powers is likely to quash the desire of so many Scots for independence so we may well be stuck in this doom loop of chunter until a second vote decides it for good, one way or another.

However, the time for a Yes/No vote on such a complex issue is not when we are split 50/50 and Donald Trump has just entered the debate.