Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Donald MacLeod: Trouble is sure to flare if SPFL start spying on football fans

Flares are thrown onto the pitch at Forfar (Ross Parker / SNS Group)
Flares are thrown onto the pitch at Forfar (Ross Parker / SNS Group)

That and the annual boring bickering over league reconstruction and a winter shutdown.

Not this time!

Now it’s a huge flare-up over flares that has pundits and fans slavering in rage. And I’m not talking about a re-emergence of bell bottoms.

The overreaction to this very small problem by the police and SPFL has been of epic proportions and has probably done more to damage our national game than any wee banger throwing a smokey one ever could.

The police response is fair enough, they are just doing their job. But just what on earth are the SPFL playing at?

Spies Are Us? In From The Cold? Spectre v 007? Whatever it is, it’s certainly not football!

Spending £4 million of our hard-earned tax on scary facial recognition systems and other hi-tech surveillance gadgets instead of on football development is a licence to kill what’s left of our national game.

It will make it a mission impossible to attract stay-away fans back.

Who will have access to the data gathered? How secure will it be? Would we also be expected to give our fingerprints?

And, given the small size that some of these flares and smoke bombs come in, would strip searches be introduced?

What sort of message does that give out? How will the scary measures encourage fans to return?

It frightens them away and gives the impression that football is still beset with violence and disorder when it is actually at the safest level it has ever been.

First alcohol was banned, then it was standing up, then it was singing, then fags and now it’s the odd flare and smoke bomb, both of which are almost an integral part of the game in Europe, adding greatly to the atmosphere.

And no one, as far as I know, has been injured by one!

I’m not advocating the use of them and I’m not going to condone the minority of bams who know full well they’re breaking the law by setting them off.

But we don’t need such a heavy hammer to crack just few nuts!

When I take my rose-tinted specs off and look back at games I attended as a kid, I remember it being a lot more dangerous, with stabbings, slashings, bottlings and rioting between rival fans.

Unlike today, though, every game was a full house and the atmosphere was electric, with song after song – the contents of which no one bothered about – belting out across the stadium. And the football played was sublime.

How times have changed, and in many respects, fan safety being one, for the better.

But it’s always the negatives we hear about, flares being the latest, and in doing so we turn off future fans and those who may have thought of going back to the game.

And clubs, because of the reckless actions of a very small minority of so-called fans, are hounded and heavily penalised by their own governing bodies.

Junior clubs like Linlithgow Rose, whose poor president Les Donaldson is no doubt sick with worry over the fines they may have to fork out because of two eejits.

The sad reality is that their Scottish Cup tie at Forfar was abandoned, not because of the throwing of smoke bombs but because of dodgy floodlights.

As with the brains of the SPFL the bulbs popped and the lights went out.

The future of football at all levels relies on there being success on the pitch.

If football’s governing bodies want to attract lapsed fans or those kids who would rather play FIFA on their PlayStations, then real money – £4 million would be a start – should be invested in the game at grassroots level and beyond to guarantee that success.

A football ground is a place for pies, not spies, and they certainly shouldn’t be playing at James Bond with our money.

That is just creating a smoke screen and pouring petrol on a fire that is already well lit.


READ MORE

Gordon Smith: Who will pay for SPFL’s facial recognition cameras?

Ron Scott: It’s time SFA got strict on fans not clubs